Langford Analytic · Knowledge Base

FE Model Verification Checklist

Review prompts for FE model verification — reactions, hand calculations, mesh convergence, limiting cases, sensitivity and singularity checks.

Article 01.07FEA Review5 min read
FEAverificationreviewchecklistreactionsconvergence

Purpose

For verifying that the FE model has been solved correctly before results are used for engineering decisions.

Equilibrium Checks

  • Do reaction forces balance applied loads to within 1% in each direction? — The first check — if this fails, stop
  • Are reaction force distributions consistent with the expected load path? — Not just the sum, but the distribution
  • For contact models, does the net contact force balance the applied normal load? — Contact equilibrium

Hand Calculation Comparison

  • Is there a hand calculation or analytical solution for comparison at a simple section? — P/A, Mc/I, or beam formula
  • Does the FE nominal stress match the hand calculation within an expected tolerance? — Within 5% for a clean section
  • Is the global displacement consistent with an order-of-magnitude estimate? — Check before trusting local stress

Mesh Convergence

  • Has mesh convergence been demonstrated for the specific output used for design? — Not just displacement
  • Are at least three mesh densities shown approaching an asymptote? — Coarse, medium, fine
  • Is the change between the two finest meshes below the acceptance criterion? — Typically 5% for design, 2% for qualification
  • If Richardson extrapolation is used, is the convergence rate recorded? — And the estimated remaining error

Singularity and Sensitivity

  • Has the peak stress location been tested for singularity by local mesh refinement? — If stress increases unboundedly, it is singular
  • Has a sensitivity study been performed on the most uncertain assumptions? — Friction, boundary stiffness, preload
  • Are the most sensitive assumptions identified and documented? — Which inputs control the answer

Physical Checks

  • Is the deformed shape physically sensible — no artefacts or non-physical motion? — Visual check is non-negotiable
  • Does the total model mass match the design mass? — Within 2%
  • Are there no solver warnings or error messages unresolved? — Check the message file

Related Knowledge